Here’s a tidbit that can come in handy in the right case. In Murphy v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., 772 F.2d 273 (6th Cir. 1985), the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court’s ruling that an insured’s willingness to submit to a polygraph test as part of the insurance company’s investigation was admissible
The Florida Sun
You may have noticed I haven’t posted any entries for a few days, but I’ve got a good excuse – – sunny, beautiful Florida.
While I was out basking in the sun, banging a golf ball from sand-trap to sand-trap, and watching my little girls explore the ocean, John Day made reference to our new blog at…
Certificates of Insurance Do Not Create Policy Coverage Obligations
One of the issues that arises far too often in cases I handle is lack of understanding of the purpose or role of documents called “Certificates of Insurance.” A “Certificate of Insurance” is not an insurance policy – it has no insuring provision, no exclusions, and typically no terms or conditions. These “Certificates” are usually issued by…
Policy Language Often Provides Valuation Measure
While I acknowledge Clift v. Fulton Fire Insurance Company, 315 S.W.2d 9 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1958), cert. denied, provides a rule for allowing valuation of property under a somewhat “elastic” standard of “value to the owner,” this ambiguous standard should not apply where the valuation provisions of property coverage are specifically set forth…
Utilizing the Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act
The Tennessee legislature has listed certain certain practices which constitute unfair acts or practices in the business of insurance. See T.C.A. § 56-8-105. The statute, known as the Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act, creates standards and rules by which insurance companies must abide when settling claims. For example, the Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act…
Litigation Tactics – Solidifying Your Bad Faith Claim
So you finally got a case in which you’re just certain the insurance company is acting in bad faith . . . What do you do now? Protect it! In a case where you think you’ve caught the insurance company red-handed for acting in bad faith, it is crucial that you take the steps to…
Misrepresentation on Application Concerning Ownership of Property Voids Policy
On April 30, 2009, the Tennessee Court of Appeals issued yet another opinion on the topic of misrepresentations on insurance applications. The case is Tennessee Farmers Mut. Ins. Co. v. Farrar (view slip opinion here).
First, it should be noted that T.C.A. 56-7-103 provides that a misrepresentation on an application voids the policy if…
The Importance of a Diary
Policyholders all too often underestimate the importance of keeping a diary of the various events that occur during the course of a claim. Why is it important? First, it is a simple fact that memories fade with time. Although claims should be resolved promptly, they often are not. The process can be complicated with numerous…
Top 10 Reasons Complaints are Made Against Insurance Companies
According to an April 28, 2009 report by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners ("NAIC"), the top ten reasons consumers complain about their insurance coverage are as follows:
- Claim Handling – Delays
- Claim Handling – Denial of Claim
- Claim Handling – Unsatisfactory Settlement/Offer
- Claim Handling – Other
- Underwriting – Premium & Rating
- Underwriting – Cancellation
- Policyholder
…
The Valued Policy Statute Should Not Be Limited to Losses Caused by Fire
Parks Chastain recently authored a post here in which he opined that Tennessee’s valued policy statute should apply only to losses caused by fire, not wind. I disagree.
Tennessee’s valued policy statutes (T.C.A. 56-7-801 through 803) were enacted in 1927, and last edited just a few years later. Read together, these statutory provisions, known as the…