Tennessee is a valued policy state, which means that in most instances an insurance company must pay policy limits in the event of a “total loss.” Back in 2009, Parks and I offered some differing viewpoints about what a total loss is or should be (see here and here). One of the issues we
valued policy
Should a Deductible Be Subtracted in the Case of a Total Loss?
Consider this scenario – – Jane Doe insures her home for $100,000, with a $1,000 deductible. Unfortunately, Jane’s house burns to the ground and is undeniably a "total loss" within the meaning of Tennessee’s valued policy statute (click here for a prior post on when a loss should be considered a "total loss"). After months…
Recent Developments – Adams v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Company
Earlier this week, the Tennessee Court of Appeals issued a 24 page opinion addressing a variety of issues affecting insureds in the State of Tennessee. The case is Adams v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Company, a copy of which is available here. My partner, Clint Scott, and I represented the insured in this case, which…
“Total Loss” Doesn’t Necessarily Mean “Burned to the Ground”
Tennessee’s valued policy law(T.C.A. 56-7-803) provides that an insurer is liable to the policyholder for the full policy limits if a total loss occurs. As a result, the big "fight" is often over the issue of whether a loss is "total" or "partial" in nature. Back in May, Parks Chastain commented here that the identity…
The Valued Policy Statute Should Not Be Limited to Losses Caused by Fire
Parks Chastain recently authored a post here in which he opined that Tennessee’s valued policy statute should apply only to losses caused by fire, not wind. I disagree.
Tennessee’s valued policy statutes (T.C.A. 56-7-801 through 803) were enacted in 1927, and last edited just a few years later. Read together, these statutory provisions, known as the…