My learned friend Parks Chastain recently posted here that Tennessee law provides for a reverse bad faith penalty of not more than 25% of the amount claimed when a policyholder does not bring an action in good faith. Parks’ use of the adage "what’s good for the goose is good for the gander" is right
Brandon McWherter
Experts Hired by Insurance Companies to Assist with Claim Decisions Should be Unbiased
As a result of the numerous tornados that have passed through Tennessee over the past decade, I have become acutely aware of the fact that insurance companies use the same engineering firms over and over again in their investigation of whether a claim constitutes a covered loss. The obvious problem with insurance companies’ repeated use…
The Tennessee Supreme Court’s Treatment of Tennessee Consumer Protection Act Claims in the Insurance Setting
I ran across a good article (pdf) this evening by Robins H. Ledyard entitled Treatment of Insurance Claims under Tennessee Consumer Protection Act. Published in the Federation of Regulatory Counsel Journal in the Fall of 2008, the article gives a short synopsis of our Supreme Court’s analysis of TCPA claims in the…
A Word About the Crossley Decision
On the topic of whether independent adjusters should be held liable under the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act (see my prior post here and Parks’ rebuttal here), a case commonly cited by defendant insurance companies and adjusters is Crossley Const. Corp. v. National Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford, 237 S.W.2d 652 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). …
Independent Adjusters Can Be Held Liable for Violations of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act
Magistrate Ed Bryant (W.D. Tenn.) recently issued a Report and Recommendation in one of my cases in which he held that Tennessee law allows an independent adjuster to be held liable under the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act. The defendant independent adjuster argued that my client failed to state a claim under the TCPA because the…
An Insured’s Willingness to Take a Polygraph Test – Admissible?
Here’s a tidbit that can come in handy in the right case. In Murphy v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., 772 F.2d 273 (6th Cir. 1985), the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court’s ruling that an insured’s willingness to submit to a polygraph test as part of the insurance company’s investigation was admissible…
The Florida Sun
You may have noticed I haven’t posted any entries for a few days, but I’ve got a good excuse – – sunny, beautiful Florida.
While I was out basking in the sun, banging a golf ball from sand-trap to sand-trap, and watching my little girls explore the ocean, John Day made reference to our new blog at…
Utilizing the Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act
The Tennessee legislature has listed certain certain practices which constitute unfair acts or practices in the business of insurance. See T.C.A. § 56-8-105. The statute, known as the Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act, creates standards and rules by which insurance companies must abide when settling claims. For example, the Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act…
Litigation Tactics – Solidifying Your Bad Faith Claim
So you finally got a case in which you’re just certain the insurance company is acting in bad faith . . . What do you do now? Protect it! In a case where you think you’ve caught the insurance company red-handed for acting in bad faith, it is crucial that you take the steps to…
Misrepresentation on Application Concerning Ownership of Property Voids Policy
On April 30, 2009, the Tennessee Court of Appeals issued yet another opinion on the topic of misrepresentations on insurance applications. The case is Tennessee Farmers Mut. Ins. Co. v. Farrar (view slip opinion here).
First, it should be noted that T.C.A. 56-7-103 provides that a misrepresentation on an application voids the policy if…