In this age where assaults against policy conditions are common, it is good to see a court recognize that an insured has an obligation, and a burden, when seeking to recover insurance benefits. In Meyers v. Farm Aid Association of Loudon County, No. E2103-02585-COA-R9-CV, filed December 9, 2014 (download Meyers v. Farmers Aid),
2014
Legitimate Difference of Opinion Should Not Constitute Bad Faith
Tennessee “bad faith” law has long held that the statutory “bad faith penalty” set forth in T.C.A. 56-7-105 is not appropriate when the insurer’s refusal to pay rests upon legitimate and substantial legal grounds or when the payment demand is greater than the judgment ultimately recovered. Tyber v. Great Central Ins. Co., 572 F.2d …
Tennessee Federal Court Allows Claim for Punitive Damages Against Insurer to Proceed
In Montesi v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 970 F. Supp.2d 784 (W.D. Tenn. Aug. 8, 2013), the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee allowed a policyholder’s claim for punitive damages to proceed, holding that punitive damages are recoverable in a stand-alone claim for negligence infliction of emotional distress. Ms. Montesi…
New Hampshire Ins. Co. v. Blackjack Cove, LLC, Part III
This is my last post on Judge Sharp’s recent decision in New Hampshire Ins. Co. v. Blackjack Cove, LLC (the opinion can be viewed here) – – unless Parks decides to pick a fight with me about the case. In this installment, I’m going to focus on a small section of the opinion involving…
New Hampshire Ins. Co. v. Blackjack Cove, LLC, Part II
Yesterday I commented on Judge Sharp’s denial of the insurer’s motion for summary judgment on the policyholder’s bad faith claim in New Hampshire Ins. Co. v. Blackjack Cove, LLC, but there was another gold nugget in his opinion as well. The basic facts of the case were that Blackjack Cove (a marina on Old Hickory…
Tennessee Federal Court Denies Motion for Summary Judgment as to Bad Faith Claim
In a recent opinion by the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Judge Sharp denied an insurance company’s motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of an insured’s claim for statutory bad faith. The case is New Hampshire Ins. Co. v. Blackjack Cove, LLC, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40122 (M.D. Tenn. March 26,…
Amendment to Sinkhole Statute Clarifies Coverage Litigation
As many are aware, the Tennessee Legislature recently amended T.C.A. § 56-7-130, the statute requiring insurance carriers offering homeowner’s insurance in the state to “make available” sinkhole coverage to their insureds. The original statute was enacted in 2006, and its verbiage has created a few issues now going through the court systems. I wanted to comment further…
Sixth Circuit Rules that Insurer Need Not Disclose its Investigation Prior to an Examination Under Oath
The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals (federal court system) has ruled that an insurance carrier need not provide an insured with any of its investigation prior to the taking of an examination under oath. Many times, the insureds or their counsel, will request certain documentation from the file before the examination under oath is …
Is Cosmetic Roof Damage a “Direct, Physical Loss?”
I recently represented the owner of a commercial property in a hail damage claim in which the metal roof was clearly dented by hail. Remarkably, the insurance company denied the claim on the basis that the roof was still functional. In the process of working with the opposing lawyer to obtain payment, I ran across…
Punitive Damages for Failure to Pay on an Insurance Policy?
The issue of whether punitive damages are available to an insured when an insurance company wrongfully denies a claim was recently addressed by the Tennessee Court of Appeals in Riad v. Erie Insurance Exchange. Over the years, this issue has been confused by many state and federal courts in Tennessee, but the Riad court…